Thursday, May 29, 2014

5.29.14: Online Writing Instruction - Social Media and Adult Education

5.29.14: Online Writing Instruction - Social Media and Adult Education



               In their essay, “Adult Education and the Social Media Revolution,” Marvin LeNoue, Tom Hall and Myron Eighmy examine new possibilities for designing and delivering digitally-mediated technologies in adult education. More specifically, they advocate the use of social media technology in pedagogy, and explicitly argue that “social software offers educators more ways to engage learners than any preceding educational technology” (1). Ultimately, they argue that social media technologies, above other pedagogical tools are the most effective for distance learning.
               Beginning with a brief synopsis on the rising popularity of distance learning, LeNoue et al. go on to suggest that there is an exigence for “delivery systems that can maximize learner independence and freedom by supporting open-enrollment and self-paced learning while providing the capabilities for communication and collaboration,” which is demanded by traditional constructivist pedagogy. This collaborative feature, they argue, is simply not readily available in most Learning Management Systems (LMS) and thus, they are not equipped to meet the needs of the contemporary distance student.
               Their main complaint about LMS is that they tend to be heavily institution-and-content-centric, which contributes to the establishment of flattened communication networks and hinders collaborative information flow. They write:
Learning Management Systems are well suited for managing student enrollment, exams, assignments, course descriptions, lesson plans, messages, syllabi, and basic course materials. However, these systems are developed for the management and delivery of learning, not for supporting the self-governed and problem-based activities of students. (2)
               The solution, according to LeNoue et al., can be found in Web 2.0 social media applications. They suggest that the collaborative nature of social media allows for greater involvement with course content because “these applications have provided Internet users with the ability to easily create, contribute, communicate, and collaborate in the online environment without need for specialized programming knowledge” (2). With their foundation thus established, LeNoue et al., proceed to define social software, social media, and social network sites (SNS), and provide numerous examples for each. The list of social applications provided is useful and offer a library of technologies (including some I hadn’t previously considered) that are certainly worth investigating and would seemingly prove useful in writing pedagogy.
               Ultimately, though, the uses for each of the social media applications mentioned is generally very broad. It would have been more beneficial if they had included case studies, or working examples of how these applications were actually utilized in teaching. While I think LeNoue et al. make a convincing argument for the use value of social media in distance pedagogy, I would have liked more specificity as to the practical use of some of the individual applications rather than the repeated insistence of their general use value – a point, which I just do not think has that much opposition anymore. Had individual examples been provided, this essay would have been more personally valuable as I set out to design a distance writing pedagogy unit. Overall, though, it was an interesting essay and is a valuable contribution in support of utilizing social technologies in distance pedagogy.


LeNoue, Marvin, Tom Hall, and Myron A. Eighmy. "Adult Education and the Social Media Revolution." Adult Learning 22.2 (2011): 4-12. Education Research Complete. Web. 26 May 2014.

1 comment:

  1. I liked your conclusions and assessment here. It gave me a good sense of the value and limitations. Such an article surely would need case studies to be truly valuable. Incidentally, I agree with the authors about LMS. As I've looked for better ways to use the one at my institution, I've become dismayed at how clunky it is. Although it allows some interaction, it mostly feels like a cubby hole for teachers to stash documents that students might want to retrieve. Wouldn't a course website do the job better? I suppose LMS were designed by techhies visualizing education as content distribution by the teacher.

    ReplyDelete