6.2.14: Online Writing Instruction – Paying Attention to
Adult Learners Online: The Pedagogy and Politics of Community
Kristine Blair and Cheryl Hoy’s essay, “Paying Attention to
Adult Learners Online: The Pedagogy and Politics of Community,” addresses two
relevant issues in adult online writing education. The first deals with “virtual
community,” and argues that more frequent/more personal communication between the
instructor/student is not only essential for the success of adult learners, but
is also “the most powerful tool in teaching and learning” (2) for this
demographic. The second issue involves
what they term “invisible labor.” They define this as the additional, unobserved
efforts of instructors, which are necessarily increased with adult students in online
writing courses. Blair and Hoy write that “despite the large amount of
discussion board traffic that occurs in an online course, very often the
student-teacher interaction that occurs via [other media] is inaccessible to
evaluators [thus,] the labor of adult education becomes invisible to those
supervising” (2). The result is that instructors are missing a valuable
evaluation component that can effect their compensation and/or promotion
opportunities.
Blair and Hoy argue that the traditional writing student has
seemingly garnered the lion’s share of research in online instructional design.
In response to this exigence, they argue for attention to the “differences in
needs, motivation, production, and assessment between adult online learners and
traditional college student learners” (2), and address the “numerous
administrative and supervisory dilemmas in addition to the need for [enhanced] communication
models that fit the needs of the adult learner population” (2). Overall, their
two-pronged argument is well-supported and certainly makes a convincing case on
both fronts.
And while this is a valuable contribution to the study of teaching
adult learners in online writing courses, it could be argued that the “traditional”
student could also benefit from the increased, individualized attention they
champion specifically for the adult leaner. Further, this could even be
expanded to include other “non-traditional” students – demographics not solely defined
via chronological age. Yet, in suggesting application to other demographics, I
do so with the acknowledgement that the added workload in teaching online
courses in this manner, does indeed have ramifications for the instructor.
Blair and Hoy do, however, propose at least one idea to at
least assist the instructor’s dilemma in this scenario. They suggest that the “blind
cc” feature on emails may be useful in order for evaluators to see the full
breadth of actual interactions with their online adult students – although they
do recognize that this could raise privacy issues – an important consideration
to be sure.
Ultimately, Blair and Hoy hope that:
Computers and writing
specialists will continue to rethink traditional design and delivery modes for
writing instruction that presume collaborative, community models will transfer seamlessly
from the face-to-face to the distance classroom. [And] it is equally important
that online writing instructors receive appropriate incentive, reward, and
recognition for the impact of technology on academic labor. (16)
Blair, Kristine, and Cheryl Hoy. "Paying Attention to Adult Learners Online: The Pedagogy and Politics of
Community." Computers & Composition 23.1 (2006): 32-48. Education Research Complete. Web. 31
May 2014.
I tend to agree that differentiating adult and non-traditional learners from traditional learners in OWI seems arbitrary and potentially divisive. A more holistic perspective on general accessibility and function of OWI pedagogy, learning activities, and ICTs, as advocated by the CCCC Position Statement of Principles and Example Effective Practices for Online Writing Instruction (2013), would go a long way toward bringing together conversations and expectations about various demographic groups.
ReplyDeleteWarnock (2008) offers one potential solution that would help make more visible the invisible work of online instruction - and help instructors remain organized, too: maintains a careful folder structure for email sent and received by semester, course, and topic. In this way, the number (and potentially content) of email messages sent and received in the course of conducting the course might be provided to evaluators and T&P committee members.